Topic: Jail Populations

More than 250 participants assembled in Seattle on October 5-7 for the fourth national Safety and Justice Challenge Network Meeting.  Convened for the initiative by the Pretrial Justice Institute, the event drew teams from Safety and Justice Challenge Network sites across the country, as well as representatives of coordinating and consulting organizations and strategic allies, for two and a half days of panels, presentations, and workshops on the theory and practice of reducing excessive jail usage and making justice systems more fair and effective.

https://youtu.be/b5tei79dTXs?list=PLan_fSNNRi6VezHEEKDj-CYMwWFUMK7KQ

Highlights of the conference included updates on the work underway from each of the twenty Challenge Network sites.  Attendees heard presentations on the Data-Driven Justice Initiative, the Stepping Up Initiative, and related criminal justice reform movements taking shape across the nation.  Panels explored such issues as the role of judges in sparking and sustaining reforms, the best ways to ensure that people with mental health needs are served outside the criminal justice system, the important lessons local justice system actors can learn from local crises, and valuable tactical advice on implementing change with a broad coalition of stakeholders.  Workshops covered the secrets of organizational culture change, techniques of meaningful community engagement, and a variety of other topics of interest to local reformers.

https://youtu.be/DydCRartK6A?list=PLan_fSNNRi6VezHEEKDj-CYMwWFUMK7KQ

Of course, there were plenty of opportunities to network and socialize as well. Teams from each of the sites got to meet among themselves away from the pressures of the office. Judges and court administrators, sheriffs and jail administrators, police, prosecutors, defenders, elected officials, and other important stakeholder groups had a chance to come together with their peers from other sites—to share techniques and backstories, troubleshoot problems, and brainstorm possibilities.  To be, in short, a learning community.

That was the whole idea.  The goal of the Safety and Justice Challenge is to focus the energies of the criminal justice field on developing, demonstrating, and spreading solutions to the problem of jail misuse and overuse. To achieve this, the members of the Challenge Network will have to lead the way—not only changing practice in their own communities, but bringing others alongside.  That’s why meetings like the one in Seattle matter.  You can’t build a movement without them.

Planning for the next Safety and Justice Challenge Network meeting, to be held in Denver on May 8-9, 2017, has just begun.  But we know it’s going to be even bigger.  In addition to the twenty Challenge Network sites, we’ll have representatives from communities selected to receive support from the Safety and Justice Challenge Innovation Fund, which will be announced early next year. Small grants from the Innovation Fund, being administered by the Urban Institute, will seed jail-incarceration reduction projects all over—which means not just more people and places engaged in local criminal justice reform, but more excitement, more ideas, more sharing, and more potential breakthroughs.

The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation has embarked on a new program of investment in local criminal justice reform at a crucial time in American history. The primary institutions of local justice—police, courts, and jails—have recently come under unprecedented scrutiny, as the nation’s attention has been riveted by a series of tragedies in Ferguson, Baltimore, New York, Louisiana, Minnesota, Dallas, Milwaukee, and elsewhere. This is the challenging environment in which the work of the Safety and Justice Challenge has begun.

That work is predicated on the belief that our nation relies excessively on incarceration as a response to crime and social disorder, and that the problem must be tackled first in the jails that anchor local systems of justice. With more than 11 million annual admissions, America’s jails have devastating impacts on individuals, families, neighborhoods, and our society as a whole. The effects are especially toxic and divisive in communities of color, which suffer disproportionately from the damaging consequences of overuse and misuse of jails. National leadership is needed to focus the energies of the field on developing, demonstrating and spreading more balanced approaches that reflect a fair, just, and equitable system of justice.

From the outset we have been surprised and gratified by the field’s embrace of the Safety and Justice Challenge. When the Challenge was first announced in the fall of 2014, a total of 191 jurisdictions spanning 45 states and accounting for roughly one-third of the nation’s total jail capacity, sought to participate. We chose 20 applicant sites to support through a data analysis and collaborative planning process, designed to yield actionable plans for safely reducing local jail incarceration and racial and ethnic disparities in jail usage. Eleven have now been selected for a second round of deep implementation funding. With an initial two years of support and the help and advice of a consortium of national experts, our “core” or implementation sites are now beginning to undertake policy and practice changes intended to keep people out of jail who don’t belong there, diverting them where possible, shortening their stays, and testing and strengthening safe alternatives. The other nine “partner” sites remain active members of the Challenge Network learning community, receiving grants to support continued progress and planning, and will be eligible for subsequent rounds of funding in 2017.

The Network will soon get even bigger. A new Innovation Fund, established by the Foundation at the Urban Institute, will shortly begin providing seed funding to many more jurisdictions seeking support for new approaches. Our intention is not just to provide short-term support for change, but to build capacity for larger reform efforts over the longer term, and thus to help grow a broader national movement to address the overuse and misuse of jails.

We are surrounding all these local efforts with investments in communications, research and evaluation, and strategic alliances with key stakeholder groups, not only to support change in local sites, but to amplify the results achieved and soften the ground for the spread of reform at the national level.

While it is still early to say what will be the results of all this activity, we are already learning that every local criminal justice system is different—and that all are, in some sense, the same. Our core sites, charged with developing their own solutions to local problems, are working from different starting points, tackling different issues, operating within different legal structures and cultural contexts, and employing different levers to achieve incarceration reduction goals. At the same time, they all struggle with the historic legacy of racism, and the stark racial and ethnic disparities that burden local criminal justice systems as a result. All face challenges stemming from breakdowns and shortfalls in community mental health, drug treatment, education, and other local systems. And in order to make significant changes, all need the cooperation of a multitude of agencies and stakeholder groups that do not traditionally work together.

Yet we are encouraged and energized by our network of partners, by the enthusiasm they bring to the work, and by the progress they have already made in collaborating across systems, using data to drive planning and problem-solving, and engaging their communities in planning and implementing change.

We recognize, as we have from the outset, that there will be no quick victories here, and that we have a lot more to learn. However, we are more convinced than ever of the importance of this work and of the need for commitment to accelerating the momentum required to reach unstoppable change in how America thinks about and uses its jails in the context of more fair, equitable and effective local systems of justice.

This Director’s Reflection originally appeared on the Foundation’s website. 

More and more, local jails are recognized as incarceration’s front door—the entry point for people who move through the criminal justice system. Intended primarily to house people awaiting trial or other case resolution who pose a danger to the community or risk of flight, jails have become warehouses for those too poor to afford bail or too sick to be managed in the community.

This is especially true of a population that has been largely forgotten in conversations about reform: women.

At this critical moment in jail and local justice system reform, a report, Overlooked: Women and Jails in an Era of Reform, released in August by the Vera Institute of Justice and the MacArthur Foundation’s Safety and Justice Challenge,  focuses on  women in jail—with the aim of reframing the conversation about jail reform to include them.

Nearly two-thirds of the women in jail are women of color—44% are black, 15% are Hispanic, and five percent are of other racial/ethnic backgrounds. And because nearly 8 in 10 women in jail are mothers—most of them single mothers—their incarceration has far-reaching impacts on families and communities.

Recent national attention given to the overuse of jails has galvanized efforts to reduce pretrial detention for low-level, non-violent offenses and to divert people with mental illnesses, substance use disorders, and histories of trauma away from the justice system.

Such efforts ought to benefit women, whose justice involvement is often driven by minor offending and behavioral health and trauma-related struggles. Nevertheless, the number of jail-incarcerated women continues to increase, even as the number of men in jail has begun to decline slightly.

In fact, women in jail are now the fastest growing of any correctional population, and the number of women held on any given day has grown 14-fold since 1970—from just under 8,000 to almost 110,000 by 2014. This growth has been even more dramatic in small counties, where the number of women in jails has increased 31-fold since 1970.

Even though jurisdictions across the country have engaged in successful initiatives to reduce the number of people in their jails, often using evidence-based and data-driven processes, their efforts frequently fail to benefit women in meaningful ways. This is, in part, because the research they use to inform their practices draws primarily—or exclusively—on studies of incarcerated men.

The lack of current research on—and evidence-based programming for—justice-involved women leaves those interested in alternatives with little guidance on how to reduce the number of women in jails.

Local reforms are essential to reduce the growing number of people behind bars. Such reforms are arguably even more critical for incarcerated women than for men. Half of all incarcerated women in the U.S. are held in local jails, and half are in prisons.  In contrast, one-third of incarcerated men are  held in jails and two-thirds are in prison. In order to implement changes successfully, however, jurisdictions must better understand exactly how they use their jails.

For example, some states hold more than 50 percent of women in jails as compared to prisons. In California, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Utah, two thirds of all incarcerated women are held in jails.

While California’s concentration of women in jails is likely due, at least in part, to the state’s decision to expand the time people can serve locally up to eight  years—diverting people convicted of non-violent, non-serious, and non-sexual offenses away from prisons—explanations for other states vary.

One reason for the greater proportion of women in jails could be that the minor offenses that bring women into the justice system are often addressed at the county or municipal levels, resulting in either short jail sentences or community supervision. Additionally, jurisdictions with limited pretrial release options may see inflated numbers of women in their jails because women, who are generally more financially marginalized, may be less able to afford cash bail.

Research on women in jails is scarce at both local and national levels. That’s why we need to examine every stage of the criminal justice system in order to better understand why women come into contact with it; how they experience the system as their cases are processed, both in and out of custody; and how the impacts of justice involvement stay with women once they return to their communities.

It’s time to bring women into the conversation, as more and more jurisdictions begin rethinking how they use jails—including the 20  that are participating in the Safety and Justice Challenge to safely reduce the number of people in their jails.

Without explicitly addressing the drivers of women’s justice involvement and their needs once they are swept into the system, the growing number of women in jails—and their families—will be left behind in the era of mass incarceration reform.

This post originally appeared on The Crime Report. 

As revealed in a new report—Overlooked: Women and Jails in an Era of Reform—by the Vera Institute of Justice and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation’s Safety and Justice Challenge, the number of women incarcerated in local jails has grown 14-fold since 1970.

While incarcerated women share many of the same experiences and characteristics of incarcerated men, women can experience incarceration and its collateral consequences in unique ways. Unlike incarcerated men, women are often single parents and enter jails with higher rates of mental illness. Because women earn less and are less likely to have full-time employment before their arrest, bail, fines, and fees can be even more devastating to them. This is especially true for women of color—almost half of all single black and Latina women have zero or negative net wealth.

Once women enter the criminal justice system, they often encounter policies, programs, and services designed for the majority of the people moving through it: men. Standard practices and procedures for law enforcement and correctional staff can create or reignite traumatic experiences for these women, the majority of whom come into the justice systems having experienced high rates of violence and are at higher risk of experiencing sexual violence in custody.

Shifting attention and resources away from policing minor offenses and leveraging existing community resources and services can provide opportunities to intervene early on during anyone’s experience with the justice system and safely address her needs in the community. These approaches can especially benefit women. Some jurisdictions—including the twenty that are participating in the Safety and Justice Challenge—have been able to implement reforms at the very front end of the criminal justice process to divert individuals away from incarceration, minimizing the harm that can accompany even a short stay in jail.

Decline to arrest

According to the most recent national data, 82 percent of women are in jail for nonviolent offenses, and cities are increasingly rethinking the need to use jail as a response to these crimes. In 2007, the Baltimore Police Department adopted a policy of declining to arrest people for low-level, quality of life offenses. A report on the women held in Baltimore City’s jail found that in 2010, the number of women had declined by 15 percent as compared to 2005. Similarly, following the success of the City of Philadelphia’s decision to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana, the mayor signed a directive for officers to issue civil citations—instead of criminal violations—for certain low-level offenses, such as disorderly conduct and failure to disperse. The city projects the strategy will divert more than 10,000 cases out of the criminal system annually.

Pre-arrest crisis intervention for people struggling with mental illness

On average, 32 percent of women in jail have a serious mental illness – more than double the rate of men in jails and six times the rate of the general public. In Tulsa, Oklahoma, the police and other first responders can call Community Outreach Psychiatric Emergency Services (COPES) for assistance with people experiencing mental health crises in the community. COPES provides mobile crisis intervention services and can refer people to community-based treatment when needed. Between July 2014 and June 2016, COPES received more than 10,000 calls for service. Of those calls, 3,900 were for women, and only 3 percent of those calls resulted in women being taken to jail.

These programs are examples of opportunities for stakeholders to divert women away from incarceration and allow them to remain in their communities. In addition to decreasing the harm caused by prolonged justice-system involvement, community-based programming and services can offer respite to the constant economic disadvantages in women’s lives that so often affect their children. Though establishing these strategies may take considerable effort, reducing the number of women held in jails is achievable and an essential component of creating safer communities.

This post originally appeared in the National League of Cities’ CitiesSpeak blog.