Research Report

Incarceration Trends Pretrial Probation June 25, 2026

Implementing a Mobile Probation Unit

In the United States, more adults are under probation supervision than are held in prisons and jails or under parole supervision combined. In 2023, about 3.1 million, or 1 in 85 US adults, were subject to probation supervision. Probation violations, owing to technical violations or new offenses, are a significant driver of jail incarceration. With support from the MacArthur Foundation’s Safety and Justice Challenge (SJC), Palm Beach County, Florida, established its Mobile Probation Unit (MPU) to improve access to probation services, reduce probation violations, and limit jail reincarceration for people on probation.

Why This Matters

Probation departments play a critical role in determining whether people remain safely in the community or cycle back into local jails for technical violations or new arrests. Yet many people face barriers to complying with probation requirements, including lack of transportation, unstable housing, and work and family obligations. These challenges are especially pronounced in a county as dispersed as Palm Beach, where accessing probation offices can involve long travel times and multiple transfers on public transit. Providing flexible, accessible, and supportive probation services can increase compliance, reduce unnecessary jail incarceration, and improve long-term outcomes for people on probation.

What We Found

The Mobile Probation Unit was developed to bring probation services directly into communities, reducing logistical barriers that often lead to violations. Stakeholders reported several key successes associated with the intervention. The MPU was expanded beyond its initial pilot program, indicating strong early support and use. Its convenience contributed to consistent use by many people on probation, and stakeholders reported a reduction in probation violations after the MPU was implemented. Implementing the MPU also strengthened collaboration between criminal legal system stakeholders and community partners. Challenges associated with developing the MPU included inconsistent staffing of the unit, limited success reaching parts of the county most affected by racial disparities in criminal legal system involvement, and limited availability of supportive services.

How We Did It

For this case study, we conducted semistructured interviews with 16 key criminal legal system stakeholders in Palm Beach County and 10 people on probation who used the MPU; reviewed SJC progress reports and other documentation related to the development and implementation of the MPU; analyzed program data provided by local stakeholders; and examined jail population data collected by the Institute for State and Local Governance. We analyzed transcripts and notes from the interviews using NVivo qualitative analysis software, applying a codebook developed to identify themes related to the implementation of the MPU and other local criminal legal system reform efforts.

Research Report

Courts Data Analysis Incarceration Trends March 31, 2026

Creating an Initial Appearance Court in Clark County, Nevada

Jail incarceration is a critical issue in the United States, and pretrial detention accounts for a substantial share of local jail populations. Spending prolonged time in jail before trial can have far-reaching consequences for people, disrupting their employment, access to stable housing, and family responsibilities. With support from the MacArthur Foundation’s Safety and Justice Challenge (SJC), Clark County, Nevada, established the Initial Appearance Court to reduce the amount of time between a person’s arrest and their first court appearance. This case study examines the implementation of that strategy.

Why This Matters

Delays between arrest and initial court appearance can result in unnecessary detention, even for people who may ultimately never be charged by prosecutors. These delays increase jail populations, strain local resources, and contribute to disparities in criminal legal system outcomes. Seeing a judge faster allows for earlier release decisions, which can reduce negative outcomes associated with prolonged jail incarceration for individuals and jurisdictions alike.

What We Found

Clark County established the Initial Appearance Court to ensure that people arrested in the county are seen by a judge within 24 hours. Stakeholders reported that the Initial Appearance Court reduced time spent in jail before first appearance, improved efficiency, strengthened inter-agency collaboration, and enabled more individualized bail decisions. Challenges included the combination of a high case volume and the rapid turnaround times associated with the court, staffing demands, and keeping people connected to supports after their release.

How We Did It

This case study draws on three primary data sources: semistructured interviews with 12 key criminal legal system stakeholders in Clark County conducted in 2025; SJC progress reports and other documentation related to the development and implementation of the Initial Appearance Court; and jail population data collected by the Institute for State and Local Governance. We analyzed transcripts from the interviews using NVivo qualitative analysis software, applying a codebook developed to identify themes related to the Initial Appearance Court’s implementation and other local criminal legal system reform efforts.

Research Report

Incarceration Trends Pretrial Racial and Ethnic Disparities February 26, 2026

Criminal Case Processing Reforms in Harris County, Texas

Jail incarceration is a significant part of the United States’ uniquely high incarceration rates, and the harms of jail incarceration are numerous and significant. Harris County, Texas, with support from the Safety and Justice Challenge (SJC)—an initiative funded by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation to reduce overincarceration and disparities in jail populations—enacted various case processing changes to reduce the local jail population awaiting trial. This case study explores the use and impact of those strategies.

Why This Matters

High levels of jail incarceration impose substantial costs on jurisdictions, requiring greater resources with potentially limited impact on public safety. Jail incarceration also places a great deal of strain on the people incarcerated, who may be at high risk of being victimized while incarcerated, have lower wages after their release, and experience worse mental health and substance use issues. People in jail pretrial make up a large part of the jail population, and case processing time contributes to pretrial incarceration’s impact.

What We Found

Harris County employed three strategies to reduce case processing time: use of scheduling orders, more efficient evidence gathering, and the introduction of the Responsive Interventions for Change (RIC) docket. Stakeholders in Harris County viewed these strategies as successful but also noted that each came with inherent challenges.

How We Did It

We relied on three primary data sources for this case study: 11 semistructured interviews with Harris County stakeholders, analysis of materials and documentation provided by stakeholders, and analysis of jail population data collected from SJC sites by the Institute for State and Local Governance. Interviews were analyzed using NVivo qualitative analysis software. We used thematic analysis of stakeholders’ responses to identify trends using a codebook developed for this case study.

Issue Brief

Crime Data Analysis Incarceration Trends Racial and Ethnic Disparities January 14, 2026

Research Brief: The Impact of Jail Reduction Strategies on Community Safety: Findings from Two Safety & Justice Challenge Sites

This study examined whether the jail reduction strategies implemented in two SJC sites reduced jail populations without increasing crime or sacrificing community safety. Findings suggest that incarceration can be avoided without negatively impacting public safety, with recidivism rates declining after SJC implementation. Further, less time in jail resulted in greater public safety; shorter jail stays were associated with lower recidivism risk.

Research Report

Crime Data Analysis Incarceration Trends Racial and Ethnic Disparities January 14, 2026

The Impact of Jail Reduction Strategies on Community Safety: Findings from Two Safety & Justice Challenge Sites

This study examined whether the jail reduction strategies implemented in two SJC sites reduced jail populations without increasing crime or sacrificing community safety. Findings suggest that incarceration can be avoided without negatively impacting public safety, with recidivism rates declining after SJC implementation. Further, less time in jail resulted in greater public safety; shorter jail stays were associated with lower recidivism risk.